I shouldnt be banned

You have been banned for the following reason:
battle holding own villagers, again
i keep telling you to stop battle holding your own villagers. and...you won't. so now your banned. if you have a problem, take it up with a head mod.

Your ban will last until: 2008-12-08 6:49:47
1 days 23 hours 50 minutes 27 seconds remaining


Thats just not right!!

keep telling : did you receive any pm or other message.

Yea but i dont BH and i told it to nana when she warned me , my comp is REALLY old and lags like ****... i dont BH...

Nana said

Read message
Sender: nana
Sent at: 06-12-2008 7:46:40 (19 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
>.> teh f >.> he was definitely in current when i checked >.> ...and anyway......your still not allowed to attack people then just not attack over and over again e.e'


Sender: nana
Sent at: 06-12-2008 7:50:53 (15 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
your unbanned >.> .....cause the reason i banned you was for attacking your own villagers >.> could've sworn he was from current x.x sorry ~.~


Read message
Sender: nana
Sent at: 06-12-2008 7:54:37 (12 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
kk >.> i get it x.x i misread the village >.> i'll even say it was my fault this time x.x ...shows what happens when i do things in the morning Dx


Read message
Sender: nana
Sent at: 06-12-2008 7:58:13 (8 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
killing your villagers is still a no-go >.> cause then you could just use that same excuse for anyone you don't like >.>

killing own villager is a no-go, what if i raid in glacier and got attack by currentians. This is ridiculous.

yes it is
today nich attack me lolz

The rules say NOTHING about killing own villagers. It is only banable when an offensive personal reason is proven , or else it is NOT harassment and therefor is NOT banable... thats what ameise himself said to me... Even if i kill someone from current IN current , if its nothing personal and im not intentionally harasing him , i shouldnt be banned. And thats EXACTLY when someone of the strong ppl chain kills and battleholds someone , they NEVER write in PMS , because when they do , a personal offense might be noted and they might get banned , while if you dont have any pms from the person there is no proof for personal issue and therefor no reason for ban...

yup, Ameise has the point.

read the rules if you want , its only stated about harasing , and thats why ppl started complaining about BH and CK firstly , because they thought they were "harassed" when someone does it , but if there is no personal vendeta proven , its not harassment and cant be banned for...

O.o mods can be proven wrong I thought a mods were unreasonable and if you argue the punushment gets worse >_>

Raydon... it IS like that... but sometimes its not hehe xD when Linzy was mod , my ban got extended from 1 day to 1 week for asking why... >___>

Unwritten Rules of TNR

1. The mods are always right. If a mod says the sky is green or 1+1=34 well they are right. Should you happen to hallucinate while looking outside your window and see a blue sky or have a defective calculator that says 1+1=2 well you are wrong and you'll be asked to drop it and/or banned
2. Raiding is illegal, or to be more precise legality of raiding is akin to wave-particle duality of light. Sometimes raiding is "legal" while at other times it is "illegal". For details of which case applies to you when raiding refer to rule 1
3. Defending your village is illegal, if someone goes to effort to pay hospital bill and travel to your village and you keep sending him home it's obviously harassment
4. Getting robbed is also potentially illegal. Should you kill outlaw it ends up as a variant of rule 3
5. Anything you say may be twisted into a "confession", e.g. if I say I went to buy some fertiliser for my roses that would equal a confession that I made a fertiliser bomb and used it in a terrorist attack
6. There is a misconception that mods ban first and ask questions later. That is a lie. They tend not to ask questions later... Also note 0 previous offences/warnings is irrelevent
7. Your greatest weapon is not a high level jutsu complimented with high stats- it's a nice little story complimented with mod friendship to get your enemies banned.
P.S. remember this is satire and some mods do a great job so treat them nicely

zoneman22 wrote:
P.S. remember this is satire and some mods do a great job so treat them nicely

SOME = 1 , 2 or 3 , but definetely not more and it is 90% written like that only so the dude wouldnt get banned

the reason killing ur own villagers is forbiden is because the Village respect system isnt working .. usualy when ur respect of your village goes under 0 you should be automaticly an outlaw ... but since is not working u can atack ur felow villagers how much you want but its banable

nalim , NO WHERE in the rules it is stated it is banable... and its not my fault its bugged , i do lose village points , so i really do get punished for it. It is not my fault it doesnt work properly , but clearly , in the rules theres NOTHING saying it isnt right

Guess what , the ban repeated , this time from Kanu

You have been banned for the following reason:
Chain-attacking and battle holding.
You are banned from TNR for the next 48 hours for chain-attacking and battle-holding - namely, harassing - another player, despite having an extensive record of previous similar offenses.

Your ban will last until: 2008-12-08 14:09:52
1 days 23 hours 42 minutes 10 seconds remaining

What Kanu said to me

Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:17:11 (13 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Not really. .-. Since I sat here and calculated out all the evidence myself, then banned you.

Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:17:11 (22 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Not really. .-. Since I sat here and calculated out all the evidence myself, then banned you.

Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:18:05 (21 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Because the evidence didn't come from a player, it came from what I saw and recorded.

Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:20:12 (19 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Lol record as in, what I recorded today. Not your past record.

Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:23:38 (15 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
I never said you were banned for chain killing him.
(zangh3tzu)


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:24:48 (14 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Didn't I just say you weren't banned for killing him?

If you don't even intend to read my replies, this conversation is over right now.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:26:23 (13 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
I never said you killed anyone else, either. Your reading needs some improvement. ~_~



Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:27:53 (11 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Read the ban message again.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:30:47 (8 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Yup. So you should try to read everything properly before you throw in your own victimized presuppositions.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:32:31 (7 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
I already told you.

Because you chain attacked a user, and held him in battle every time.

Coincidentally, also because your alt attacked him in uncharted territory while your main was hospitalized~ but that's not the main point anyway.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:36:14 (3 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Nope lol. He didn't say anything that counted. I watched, counted battle timers, battle logs, correspondence times, players' stats, hospital list, etc. etc., into my own records. They all matched up, all the time.

All mathematics, in case you're about to whine that I took his word for it and not yours.


Read message
Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:37:46 (1 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
For the last time. You were not banned because of the actual fact of attacking/killing him as an outlaw.

And if I have to listen to one more rant-PM from you because you choose to ignore that after I repeated myself this many times, this conversation is over.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:32:31 (11 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
I already told you.

Because you chain attacked a user, and held him in battle every time.

Coincidentally, also because your alt attacked him in uncharted territory while your main was hospitalized~ but that's not the main point anyway.

Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:36:14 (7 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Nope lol. He didn't say anything that counted. I watched, counted battle timers, battle logs, correspondence times, players' stats, hospital list, etc. etc., into my own records. They all matched up, all the time.

All mathematics, in case you're about to whine that I took his word for it and not yours.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:40:19 (3 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
-______________- No, it's NOT.

It's for a) chain-attacking him and b) battle-holding.

Here's a new policy. The next time you rant without a reasoned argument behind it, OR I have to repeat myself, [/conversation]

With that in mind, feel free to reply.


Sender: Kanu
Sent at: 06-12-2008 14:43:00 (1 minutes ago)
Subject: RE: ...
Message
Lol thank you for ignoring my warning and repeating yourself/not reading my replies.

Have a nice day.

[/conversation]

raptorBG wrote:nalim , NO WHERE in the rules it is stated it is banable... and its not my fault its bugged , i do lose village points , so i really do get punished for it. It is not my fault it doesnt work properly , but clearly , in the rules theres NOTHING saying it isnt right

hmm there is a post in TNR forum where admin said me that its banable if u kill an same villager ... before i was wondering how a person from same village like me haves a 5k ryo bounty ... its -5k respect .. i said " so we can go killing our villagers" and i got answer smt like "yes if u dont mind beein banned" smt like that

And yet , TONS of ppl have that kinda -respect... and he is an OUTLAW

raptorBG wrote:And yet , TONS of ppl have that kinda -respect... and he is an OUTLAW

an outlaw that stay in current and rob currentians.

Sender: alexxl
Sent at: 07-12-2008 1:06:22 (1 minutes ago)
Subject: stop with the battle hold
Message
Insert message here

just that my offense is not so strong and PC was lag, then he say i am BH him.

Gician.. to those two ppl , EVERYONE is harassing them , BH them , CA and CK them... no matter are you or no...

they probably expect as outlaw they r 2 rob with no interference

well... yea i guess they do... and when they get some serious intereference , they start complaining about BH and CA and CK and harassment...